*******Leaked confidential NIST documents concerning the investigation into the collapse of WTC 7 reveal that an "unusual" event preceded the collapse of the building, a "jet of flames" that shot out of several windows after most of the fire had already died down and more from the LEAKED NIST DOCUMENTS

***Scholars file challenges to NIST reports on 9/11; specific examples of screwed up NIST physics, neglect, and bias inside. Too bad the media won't talk about this.

*******A whistleblower that was on a team working for Silverstein Group in 2002 has made public an extensive set of detailed architectural drawings of the World Trade Center, that prove beyond any doubt that the official reports into the collapse of the towers misrepresented their construction.  Also, the NIST has no idea what they are talking about. BLUEPRINTS INSIDE

******Must see INN World Report Interview with David Ray Griffin talking about his new book "Debunking 9/11 debunking."  Mentions several of the absolutely absurd "Popluar Mechanics" "debunkings" which completely go against 1st level Physics.  Also talks about the NIST report and their deceptions and flat out lies.

***Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan (and others) Debunk the NIST Report; no way the towers could have collapsed the way they did..without help

***Quick list of facts pointing to the towers being demolished

**4-Ton Girders needed an additional force (explosions) to land where they did

********Another excellent documentary on 9/11 with some new information. Contains camera footage of the events from a genius with (government?) clearance, undeniable scientific calculations (tower fell faster than gravity), images and eye-witness accounts of non-news helicopters before and after the towers were hit, video of 8 explosions besides the planes crashing and towers falling and more

****Here is the scientific report by Terry Morrone Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University "Since there was molten steel in the wreckage of the World Trade Center, and since the temperatures of the fires were insufficient to melt steel, and since the gravitational energy was shown to be very much smaller than the energy needed to melt steel, the Twin Towers and 7 WTC could only have been brought down by explosives or cutter charges."

****Some 9/11 common sense, Why aren't you questioning? More common sense with comments containing 5 questions we'd like to see the government answer

****Good 9/11 short video including the highly improbably coincidences, the fact that the Patriot Act was writing way before 9/11, the media ignoring the facts, experts saying it is definitely controlled demolition, burning metal a month later (impossible with jet fuel alone), the violation of Newton's Law of Conservation and more

**Someone actually attacks Rosie with evidence!  Well, attempted evidence at least.  Here is a quick debunking of Popular Mechanics' (look up who THEY are owned by!) attempted debunking of Rosie.

*****9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished

**The joke of a terror color system and a list of 9/11 "physics in action" in comments section

*******Another excellent 9/11 documentary filled with eye-witnesses accounts on people who believed the towers were brought down by demolition; experts saying the government's theory is impossible, Silverstein admitting it was brought down (If that link doesn't work for you, use this one)

*****BBC reports 9/11 "hijackers" that have turned up alive and well

*****See the smoke plume from an underground explosion along with the seismograph readings Another readout of a seismograph and another picture of underground explosion smoke and another and another and another (Remember: In a controlled demolition of a building, the bottom is blown out first, allowing it to fall straight down into its lower levels.)